The basic framework of just war theory is introduced in his
article and its central motivation analyzed. It is argued that the just war
tradition provides the best framework for discussing the moral arguments for
and against humanitarian intervention the JAB is of primary interest. Because
immoral ways of waging war or intervention will often cast doubt on its over-
all legitimacy. The
conditions of the JAB, especially that of just cause, are these days treated
more restrictively than in past so that a just war has tended to be seen
primarily as a defensive war. Military interventions in the affairs of other
states without the warrant of self- defense or defense of allies were largely
ruled out, both morally and legally. As Coady would quote in his article stating
that “ If a nation is sometimes entitles to use violence in its own defense,
then surely other nations may come to its aid as long as their objective is
indeed to help repel the attack and no more.” Though this seems easy in theory,
in practice, it’s not often the case. Most states ally with other states primarily
for their own interest; which is to exploit the state that has been invaded for
its resources.
The older tradition of allowing certain aggressive wars to be
morally licit fell into disrepute during the latter half of the twentieth
century, and the reasons for this are explored in the article. Warfare destroys
lives and property, as well as economic and diplomatic measures. Coady’s
article discusses Hobbe’s romantic idea of war which is characterized as an
epic event which turns boys into men. And like the author, I found the concept
to be distrustful. The belief is that they men can only develop the qualities
that make them desirable and honorable only at war. These qualities can be acquired through sports
or academia. For instance, the Olympics involve determination courage and honor
to excel and represent ones country is a way to acquire the said qualities. The
Romantics failed to view war as a violent event that caused gruesome death and
also traumatized the soldiers.Despite Hobbe’s theory and the other romantic
theories on war prevention being effeminate and cowardly, I would regard this
unlikely as America has avoided war for a long time and the only reason it’s at
war is because it was a last resort and as a mode of self defense. Diplomatic
means have often helped the United States; it has helped build it to this great
nation with a leading economic state.
Many in the past viewed war as we today view athletics. If you watch the World Cup or the Euros in Soccer you will hear a lot of mentions of how soccer replaces war.
ReplyDeleteWar creates hell on earth and destruction on an unimaginable scale. It cost money and drains the budget of a nation as well. It is during a war, which people become organized and think as one. Just like sports which involve organized participation and aim to provide entertainment to its audience and participants. It is guided by a set of rules to ensure fair competition and to allow the adjudication of the winner. So dies war as The Hague or United Nations Security Council provides a set of rules to follow to avoid aggressive wars and preventive deaths of civilians. Sanctions are also granted like in sports to those who are unfair. Both involve a good strategy and adaptable players in order to win. Nationalism also plays an important role in sports and it can be seen when the audience and participant adopt a partisan view. Though sports and war are linked, one serves as entertainment, while the other inflicts fear upon both the participant and the audience.
ReplyDelete