Something that stuck out to me
during this lecture was what it means to be an American soldier. It is
certainly something that changes from when we look at conscription to the idea
of a volunteer service member. The idea of the soldier in the minds of the
American public has been something fluid over the course of history. Not only does
it change within the context of a war, but it also changes depending on the
viewpoint. Protesters spit on returning soldiers from Vietnam while servicemen coming
home from the Middle East have been received by parades.
It seems that Simmon’s idea of the
rational individual was the framework by which the American public viewed
soldiers in Vietnam-and of course this is a generalization; there was a wide
spectrum of views on the war. At the time it was a shame that these young kids
were being sent abroad as puppets of the state fighting an unjust and futile
war. But now there is much more of a ‘support the troops’ mentality. To speak
negatively of a soldier in Iraq-a largely unsupported war- will find flak in casual
conversation. Is it possible that we as a nation are moving away from an
individualist frame of mind and more towards collective thinking? This would be
a hard point to argue, but I do believe there is something to glean from the
way we view our soldiers nowadays-fighting for ‘freedom’ and ‘country’ even
during an unpopular war.
No comments:
Post a Comment